BREAKING NEWS: CDC launches sneak attack; the ACIP will meet TOMORROW (Friday, June 17) and Saturday, June 18 to extend the mRNA Final Solution to little kids
BREAKING NEWS: CDC launches sneak attack; the ACIP will meet TOMORROW (Friday, June 17) and Saturday, June 18 to extend the mRNA Final Solution to little kids
This is the ONLY solution. Every person and every organization can push their members and subscribers to contact their congressmen to pass the Medical Freedom Act at the State and Federal levels. Our opponents spend billions with regulatory capture, but if just a million people made this a political issue, we could restore our freedoms virtually overnight. Look at how quickly politicians are creating laws against guns. If properly motivated, they could create laws that deliver medical freedom, and the Medical Freedom Act is something you can copy/paste directly into law.
Just emailed everyone, and their brother. Thank you for your work. I hope we can get out of this mess. As soon as the GOP takes back the house and senate, there needs to be investigations, indictments, and prosecutions. The media also needs to be help accountable for brainwashing our population. Something needs to be done. I'm sick of talk, I want heads to start rolling.
Thanks for the heads up! I sent an individual email to each name that you provided. I realize that today may be too late for them comment but hopefully they will take pause to consider an outside opinion.
Thus, while the risk/benefit ratio may still be positive in senior citizens and other risk groups (based on current evidence), this does not appear to be the case in healthy young adults and children. Danish professor in global health and vaccine expert, Dr. Christine Stabell-Benn, recently argued that she “wouldn’t recommend vaccination of anybody under 50 years of age.”
Hi Toby, I have sent you an important email to the email address you use to subscribe to my Substack. Let me know if I should use a different email address.
I put a comment on your pain syndrome post, but it occurred to me that you may not see it there because your Substack is so high volume that you may choose not to get comment notifications. So I went to this most recent post.
Okay, email sent and two separate public comments lodged. Lots of 'out of office' auto-replies, but hopefully they'll still see that they are getting lots of correspondence on this matter. If this goes through, our (Australia's) TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) will surely be next. I hope common sense (or at least scientific objectivity) will prevail.
What is going on with the public comments for the June 18th meeting regarding COVID-19 vaccination for babies and small children? I can't believe there would be so few public comments, and so many are begging for the approval of the shots so they can 'finally' get their infants injected! Do you think they are deleting or not publishing public comments asking that application for the use of these products be rejected? I have submitted a comment, but in light of the above, I'm not confident it will be lodged. (I will email the staff listed above too).
1) More FOIA docs show 800 withdrawals. These included reasons such as pulmonary embolism, stroke, fainting, tachycardia, paraparesis, hearing loss, and death.
2) Not sure what timeline this covers, or how to reconcile with the fact that far less than 800 exclusions were disclosed in the NEJM paper. Are these describing totally different timelines? Or are they flatly incompatible? And is the 800 estimated exclusions even accurate? Are "withdrawals" and "exclusions" talking about different things in different phases of the trial?
3) I notice people who got covid "between visits 1 and 2" were excluded. Not sure when these visits were. Does this describe a time before getting dose 1? If it is a time AFTER getting dose 1, then this would explain why the curves posted in the NEJM paper did not show negative efficacy after dose 1, whereas lots of other data does.
Excellent alert. As to ACIP members, you said you couldn't find Sarah S. Long's email. I couldn't either. But on the Drexel Medical School web page there is a contact person for the School of Pediatrics. I emailed c/o of her--Renee Turchi, MD, Academic Chair of Pediatrics, rmt28@drexel.edu
Just came across this... https://rumble.com/v18daq7-then-they-came-for-our-babies.html
Toby this is a great start. The ultimate solution, however, is a regulatory framework that constrains government and corporations.
https://medicalfreedomact.org/
This is the ONLY solution. Every person and every organization can push their members and subscribers to contact their congressmen to pass the Medical Freedom Act at the State and Federal levels. Our opponents spend billions with regulatory capture, but if just a million people made this a political issue, we could restore our freedoms virtually overnight. Look at how quickly politicians are creating laws against guns. If properly motivated, they could create laws that deliver medical freedom, and the Medical Freedom Act is something you can copy/paste directly into law.
Just saw you on the War Room! Thank You for putting all this together for us non medical people:) I will write emails!
Just emailed everyone, and their brother. Thank you for your work. I hope we can get out of this mess. As soon as the GOP takes back the house and senate, there needs to be investigations, indictments, and prosecutions. The media also needs to be help accountable for brainwashing our population. Something needs to be done. I'm sick of talk, I want heads to start rolling.
Thanks for the heads up! I sent an individual email to each name that you provided. I realize that today may be too late for them comment but hopefully they will take pause to consider an outside opinion.
I wrote a letter to Dr. Walensky based on your recommendation. Thank you for the work you do.
https://rberkowitzmd.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-dr-walensky-cdc-director?sd=pf
From Swiss Policy Research: https://swprs.org/how-effective-are-covid-vaccines-really/
Thus, while the risk/benefit ratio may still be positive in senior citizens and other risk groups (based on current evidence), this does not appear to be the case in healthy young adults and children. Danish professor in global health and vaccine expert, Dr. Christine Stabell-Benn, recently argued that she “wouldn’t recommend vaccination of anybody under 50 years of age.”
Hi Toby, I have sent you an important email to the email address you use to subscribe to my Substack. Let me know if I should use a different email address.
I put a comment on your pain syndrome post, but it occurred to me that you may not see it there because your Substack is so high volume that you may choose not to get comment notifications. So I went to this most recent post.
Cheers.
Okay, email sent and two separate public comments lodged. Lots of 'out of office' auto-replies, but hopefully they'll still see that they are getting lots of correspondence on this matter. If this goes through, our (Australia's) TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) will surely be next. I hope common sense (or at least scientific objectivity) will prevail.
What is going on with the public comments for the June 18th meeting regarding COVID-19 vaccination for babies and small children? I can't believe there would be so few public comments, and so many are begging for the approval of the shots so they can 'finally' get their infants injected! Do you think they are deleting or not publishing public comments asking that application for the use of these products be rejected? I have submitted a comment, but in light of the above, I'm not confident it will be lodged. (I will email the staff listed above too).
Need to escalate the following issues to Substack community. Not sure who can follow up:
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/15/pfizer-documents-800-people-never-finished-trial/
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-fa-interim-discontinued-patients.pdf
1) More FOIA docs show 800 withdrawals. These included reasons such as pulmonary embolism, stroke, fainting, tachycardia, paraparesis, hearing loss, and death.
2) Not sure what timeline this covers, or how to reconcile with the fact that far less than 800 exclusions were disclosed in the NEJM paper. Are these describing totally different timelines? Or are they flatly incompatible? And is the 800 estimated exclusions even accurate? Are "withdrawals" and "exclusions" talking about different things in different phases of the trial?
3) I notice people who got covid "between visits 1 and 2" were excluded. Not sure when these visits were. Does this describe a time before getting dose 1? If it is a time AFTER getting dose 1, then this would explain why the curves posted in the NEJM paper did not show negative efficacy after dose 1, whereas lots of other data does.
Rand Paul asked Fauci “Can you tell me if any members on the vaccine approval committees ever receive money from the people who make vaccines?”
Fauci replied “People who receive royalties are not required to divulge them”
Excellent alert. As to ACIP members, you said you couldn't find Sarah S. Long's email. I couldn't either. But on the Drexel Medical School web page there is a contact person for the School of Pediatrics. I emailed c/o of her--Renee Turchi, MD, Academic Chair of Pediatrics, rmt28@drexel.edu
Moderna plans to test the vaccine on 3-6 month old babies 🤬😭😤
https://www.biospace.com/article/moderna-planning-to-test-covid-19-vaccine-in-babies-3-to-6-months-of-age/?fbclid=IwAR32I5Ywp0-yiyyTM5pF95xqV-dEaV5txHeg2q988leZtTs0nyfldi-dTXM
Bless you for this Toby. Once again you're leagues ahead of the rest.
Thanks for doing all this legwork for us. I've sent an email to everyone on the list.
Done!